Human Generated Data

Title

Art Theory Text with Study for “American Painting”
Date

1949
People

Artist: Stuart Davis, American 1892 - 1964
Classification

Archival Material
Credit Line

Harvard Art Museums/Fogg Museum, Gift of Mrs. Stuart Davis, 1967.79.497
Copyright

© President and Fellows of Harvard College

Human Generated Data

Title

Art Theory Text with Study for “American Painting”

People

Artist: Stuart Davis, American 1892 - 1964

Date

1949

Classification

Archival Material

Credit Line

Harvard Art Museums/Fogg Museum, Gift of Mrs. Stuart Davis, 1967.79.497

Copyright

© President and Fellows of Harvard College

Machine Generated Data

Tags

Amazon
created on 2022-01-15

Text 99.9
Handwriting 96.2
Calligraphy 59.9

Clarifai
created on 2023-10-26

page 99.2
text 99.1
vintage 99.1
manuscript 99.1
print 98.9
retro 98.9
paper 98.7
old 98.2
handwriting 98
school 97.6
algebra 97.6
poetry 96.9
calligraphy 96.9
education 96.8
sepia pigment 96.7
writing 96.1
antique 96
document 95.9
script 95.7
wear 95.5

Imagga
created on 2022-01-15

journal 100
paper 38.5
old 30.7
vintage 26.5
book 26.5
notebook 24.9
antique 24.5
text 22.8
page 21.4
document 21.4
pen 17.6
map 17.6
sepia 16.6
drawing 15.9
print 15.1
envelope 14.5
design 14.1
retro 14
grunge 13.7
plan 13.3
art 13
ancient 13
ink 12.5
word 12.3
detail 12.1
letter 12
business 11.6
globe 11.1
texture 11.1
aged 10.9
wallpaper 10.7
discovery 10.7
gold 10.7
financial 10.7
world 10.7
geography 10.6
education 10.4
atlas 10.4
style 10.4
planet 10.4
close 10.3
expedition 9.9
history 9.9
handwriting 9.9
manuscript 9.8
find 9.8
continent 9.7
navigation 9.6
capital 9.5
graphic 9.5
symbol 9.4
journey 9.4
writing 9.4
pencil 9.4
tourism 9.1
religion 9
geographic 8.9
pattern 8.9
boundary 8.9
written 8.9
navigate 8.8
location 8.8
words 8.8
guide 8.8
position 8.8
route 8.8
tour 8.7
direction 8.6
draw 8.6
nation 8.5
path 8.5
travel 8.5
communication 8.4
decorative 8.4
note 8.3
country 8.2
road 8.2
office 8.1
information 8
creative 8
calligraphy 7.9
explore 7.9
bible 7.9
diary 7.8
states 7.8
read 7.7
parchment 7.7
sign 7.5
religious 7.5
city 7.5
card 7.4
artwork 7.3
border 7.2
sketch 7.2
open 7.2
binding 7.1

Google
created on 2022-01-15

Handwriting 94.9
Font 84.5
Writing 76.8
Paper 72
Paper product 69.8
Letter 68.7
Rectangle 67.9
Document 65.6
Calligraphy 54.2

Microsoft
created on 2022-01-15

text 99.8
handwriting 99.3
letter 98.3
document 62.6
book 60.3
calligraphy 52

Color Analysis

Categories

Imagga

text visuals 99.8%

Captions

Microsoft
created on 2022-01-15

text, letter 100%

Azure OpenAI

Created on 2024-02-07

This looks like a handwritten note on a piece of paper. The text, written in cursive, reads: "I 20TI 9 + I The whole concept of G. Art comes down to the following: It places the standard of first-class Drawing in non-rational decisions instead of in rational canons. It's not what it should be that is used to evaluate Art, but what its value is in instructive standards. It is not whether the subject goes or not a wrong, it is whether you like it or not. Thus Theory & Drawing implies its own technique and cannot be realized without it." In the bottom right corner, there seems to be a small doodle or sketch, possibly a geometric figure consisting of rectangles and a triangle, with the number 6 written next to it.

Anthropic Claude

Created on 2024-03-30

The image appears to be a handwritten note or document. The text discusses various topics related to art, including mentions of "national discussions instead of rational canons", "standard of first class drawing", and "the theory of drawing". The note seems to be expressing certain views or theories on art and drawing. The content is quite detailed and technical, without any references to or identification of specific individuals.

Text analysis

Amazon

of
to
be
and
its
but
by
you
without
not
and cannot be realized
should
value
it
realized
evaluate
in
used
cannot
is
whole
own
not what it should be
comes
that
down
without it.
what
decisions
whether
it.
decisions mstead of in
national
places
Art, but what its value
that is used to evaluate
right
Theory
me whole concent of
standards.
Act
me
mstead
I Act comes down to the
fogu is right R wrong, it
following It places me
as
or is not whether me Subsect.
following
unthes its own Technique
concent
Drawing
mas Theory of Drawing
is by interture standards.
Technique
national canons. It is
R
wrong,
the
as whether you like itor not.
5 tandard of first.class
first.class
Drawing in non-ratemal
Art,
5
like
not.
or
It
canons.
Subsect.
fogu
110719+1
itor
tandard
non-ratemal
interture
I
mas
unthes

Google

エニ
comes
to
the
standard
of
Tarst.claos
Drawng
decusions
mstead
not
t
he
used
Art,
but
value
standards.
mot
is
sugutaw
thes
yoou
cet
hlaces
in
non.nathonal
wrong,
like
itahot.
cannst
be
realized
エニo9 ナユ he whoce coucehr of Y-Art comes down to the foclowing, standard of Tarst.claos Drawng decusions mstead o m rational canons,ct as not what t Should he That used to evaluate Art, but What Mts value is by cnAuntue standards. er in mot whelher The Sumct. is sugutaw whe thes yoou cet hlaces he in non.nathonal wrong, like itahot. mis Fheryo Drawrngs uwnlies ts own lechmique and cannst be realized without t.
o9
ナユ
whoce
coucehr
Y-Art
down
foclowing,
o
m
rational
canons,ct
as
what
Should
That
evaluate
What
Mts
by
cnAuntue
er
whelher
The
Sumct.
whe
mis
Fheryo
Drawrngs
uwnlies
ts
own
lechmique
and
without
t.