Machine Generated Data
Tags
Clarifai
created on 2020-08-22
Imagga
created on 2020-08-22
Google
created on 2020-08-22
Microsoft
created on 2020-08-22
text | 100 | |
| ||
letter | 94.7 | |
| ||
book | 92.8 | |
| ||
handwriting | 86.7 | |
| ||
whiteboard | 83.1 | |
|
Color Analysis
Feature analysis
Amazon
Book | 100% | |
|
Text analysis
Amazon
PAGE
some
as
to
Review
Review Patent
The
translate,
by
license
Under some
Patent
PAGE 18
Institute
Patents
The license translate, and use such
for
for Purposes
Purposes
if
terms
option
The sponsor
as desc ribed
a
such
use
the
follows
it
of
Under most Institute
and
by the terms of this clause, a -free,
Under
desc
license.
material
most
this
may, if it option to such
sponsor
18
publication
ribed
clause,
iew
-free,
iew Where
thesa
Where
may,
In
material oWn
1-13-7-2-'F
oWn
NY.C.
T-28 -2-8e
PAGE 18
The sponsor, by the terms of this clause, receives a royalty-free,
non-exclusive license to reproduce, translate, and use all such
copyrighted material for its own purposes.
The sponsor may, if it prefers, receive only an option to such a
license.
3. Review for Patent Purposes
Under most research agreements, as described in Section I, which
follows,
disposition of rights in inventions, including whether and in what
countries to file patent applications. The sponsor, therefore, acquires
rights, such as exclusive or non-exclusive licenses, only when MIT
does in fact file for patents.
the Institute reserves the sole right to determine the
Under some agreements, however, the sponsor may make filing
recommendations or obtain rights in inventions which MIT might not
otherwise pursue, or in countries in which MIT might not otherwise
file. Under these circumstances, the sponsor needs an opportunity to
review potentially patentable inventions before patent rights are
defeated by publication.
The normal means of doing this is to establish a procedure for
identifying and disclosing inventions to the sponsor as they arise, or
periodic intervals, during the course of the research. This is the
most effective method of protecting patent rights without any delay in
publications.
1.5.1. under Patents.
A clause describing such a procedure is set forth as
In some cases, however, the sponsor is also given an opportunity to
review manuscripts prior to publication in order to identify and take
action on inventions which may not previously have been disclosed.
Since the publication is usually submitted to the sponsor no later than
its submission to the publisher there is normally ample time for such a
review.
Where this is not the case, however, the sponsor may be
given an opportunity to review the manuscript for a period of up to 30
days prior to submission to the publisher.
previously undisclosed and potentially patentable inventions
identified, the parties may agree to an extension of up to 60 days if
necessary in order to take appropriate steps to preserve patent
rights.
arrangements when
recommendations.
submitting material for publication (1) exceed 90 days without the
approval of the Provost's Office, or (2) delay the granting of academic
credit to a
H.3.1.
In the event that
are
This may, for example, be appropriate under consortia
coordinate filing
no event, however, may the total delay in
more
time
is
required to
In
student thesis.
An appropriate clause is set forth in
REVIEW DRAFT 5/82
NY.C.
T-28
-2-8e
PAGE
18
The
sponsor,
by
the
terms
of
this
clause,
receives
a
royalty-free,
non-exclusive
license
to
reproduce,
translate,
and
use
all
such
copyrighted
material
for
its
own
purposes.
sponsor
may,
if
it
prefers,
receive
only
an
option
license.
3.
Review
Patent
Purposes
Under
most
research
agreements,
as
described
in
Section
I,
which
follows,
disposition
rights
inventions,
including
whether
what
countries
file
patent
applications.
therefore,
acquires
rights,
exclusive
or
licenses,
when
MIT
does
fact
patents.
Institute
reserves
sole
right
determine
some
however,
may
make
filing
recommendations
obtain
inventions
might
not
otherwise
pursue,
file.
these
circumstances,
needs
opportunity
review
potentially
patentable
before
are
defeated
is
also
given
manuscripts
prior
publication
order
action
be
up
30
submission
publisher.
previously
parties
60
days
necessary
take
steps
Office,
H.3.1.
In
under
consortia
no
required
student
thesis.
An
appropriate
clause
set
forth
REVIEW
5/82
publication.
normal
means
doing
establish
procedure
identifying
disclosing
they
arise,
periodic
intervals,
during
course
research.
This
effective
method
protecting
without
any
delay
publications.
1.5.1.
Patents.
A
describing
cases,
identify
on
have
been
disclosed.
Since
usually
submitted
later
than
publisher
there
normally
ample
time
review.
Where
case,
manuscript
period
undisclosed
identified,
agree
extension
preserve
rights.
arrangements
recommendations.
submitting
(1)
exceed
90
approval
Provost's
(2)
granting
academic
credit
event
that
example,
coordinate
event,
total
more
DRAFT