Human Generated Data

Title

Inserted page

Date

1982

People

Artist: Otto Piene, German 1928 - 2014

Classification

Archival Material

Credit Line

Harvard Art Museums/Busch-Reisinger Museum, Gift of Elizabeth Goldring Piene, 2019.25.45.1

Copyright

© Otto Piene Estate

Human Generated Data

Title

Inserted page

People

Artist: Otto Piene, German 1928 - 2014

Date

1982

Classification

Archival Material

Credit Line

Harvard Art Museums/Busch-Reisinger Museum, Gift of Elizabeth Goldring Piene, 2019.25.45.1

Copyright

© Otto Piene Estate

Machine Generated Data

Tags

Amazon
created on 2020-08-22

Book 100
Text 100
Page 100
Diary 99.9

Clarifai
created on 2020-08-22

page 99.8
paper 99.8
no person 99.7
document 99.3
writing 98
retro 97.4
antique 96.8
book bindings 96.3
dirty 95.7
text 95.6
old 93.3
notebook 93.2
parchment 91.4
education 91.3
blank 90.5
devoid 89.8
literature 89.7
ancient 88.7
diary 88.7
write 88.5

Imagga
created on 2020-08-22

binding 61.2
book 53.1
paper 50.2
envelope 43.8
notebook 32.9
blank 30.9
page 29.7
old 29.3
journal 27.1
open 22.5
vintage 22.4
grunge 22.2
note 21.2
container 20.8
document 20.4
antique 19.9
texture 19.5
business 19.5
write 17.9
text 17.5
retro 17.2
empty 17.2
binder 17.1
writing 16
diary 15.6
pen 15.1
art 14.3
sheet 14.1
brown 14
cover 13.9
education 13.9
office 13.7
aged 13.6
frame 13.3
textured 13.2
design 13
letter 12.8
border 12.7
card 12.3
ancient 12.1
money 11.9
dirty 11.8
manuscript 11.8
pages 11.7
cash 11
bank 10.8
product 10.7
information 10.6
stained 10.6
read 10.6
close 10.3
object 10.3
covering 10.1
message 10.1
school 9.9
protective covering 9.9
finance 9.3
dollar 9.3
creation 9.2
currency 9
history 9
pattern 8.9
list 8.8
graphic 8.8
dollars 8.7
invitation 8.7
notes 8.6
yellow 8.6
pencil 8.6
number 8.4
historic 8.3
backdrop 8.3
religion 8.1
story 7.9
work 7.9
bible 7.8
literature 7.8
prayer 7.7
parchment 7.7
floral 7.7
age 7.6
communication 7.6
word 7.6
greeting 7.4
menu 7.3
decoration 7.2
wealth 7.2
creative 7.1
pad 7

Google
created on 2020-08-22

Text 96.7
Paper 86.2
Notebook 85.7
Document 75.3
Book 73
Paper product 71.7
Diary 71.2
Font 68.6
Vellum 65.1

Microsoft
created on 2020-08-22

text 100
letter 94.7
book 92.8
handwriting 86.7
whiteboard 83.1

Color Analysis

Feature analysis

Amazon

Book 100%

Categories

Imagga

text visuals 99.9%

Text analysis

Amazon

PAGE
some
as
to
Review
Review Patent
The
translate,
by
license
Under some
Patent
PAGE 18
Institute
Patents
The license translate, and use such
for
for Purposes
Purposes
if
terms
option
The sponsor
as desc ribed
a
such
use
the
follows
it
of
Under most Institute
and
by the terms of this clause, a -free,
Under
desc
license.
material
most
this
may, if it option to such
sponsor
18
publication
ribed
clause,
iew
-free,
iew Where
thesa
Where
may,
In
material oWn
1-13-7-2-'F
oWn

Google

NY.C. T-28 -2-8e PAGE 18 The sponsor, by the terms of this clause, receives a royalty-free, non-exclusive license to reproduce, translate, and use all such copyrighted material for its own purposes. The sponsor may, if it prefers, receive only an option to such a license. 3. Review for Patent Purposes Under most research agreements, as described in Section I, which follows, disposition of rights in inventions, including whether and in what countries to file patent applications. The sponsor, therefore, acquires rights, such as exclusive or non-exclusive licenses, only when MIT does in fact file for patents. the Institute reserves the sole right to determine the Under some agreements, however, the sponsor may make filing recommendations or obtain rights in inventions which MIT might not otherwise pursue, or in countries in which MIT might not otherwise file. Under these circumstances, the sponsor needs an opportunity to review potentially patentable inventions before patent rights are defeated by publication. The normal means of doing this is to establish a procedure for identifying and disclosing inventions to the sponsor as they arise, or periodic intervals, during the course of the research. This is the most effective method of protecting patent rights without any delay in publications. 1.5.1. under Patents. A clause describing such a procedure is set forth as In some cases, however, the sponsor is also given an opportunity to review manuscripts prior to publication in order to identify and take action on inventions which may not previously have been disclosed. Since the publication is usually submitted to the sponsor no later than its submission to the publisher there is normally ample time for such a review. Where this is not the case, however, the sponsor may be given an opportunity to review the manuscript for a period of up to 30 days prior to submission to the publisher. previously undisclosed and potentially patentable inventions identified, the parties may agree to an extension of up to 60 days if necessary in order to take appropriate steps to preserve patent rights. arrangements when recommendations. submitting material for publication (1) exceed 90 days without the approval of the Provost's Office, or (2) delay the granting of academic credit to a H.3.1. In the event that are This may, for example, be appropriate under consortia coordinate filing no event, however, may the total delay in more time is required to In student thesis. An appropriate clause is set forth in REVIEW DRAFT 5/82
NY.C.
T-28
-2-8e
PAGE
18
The
sponsor,
by
the
terms
of
this
clause,
receives
a
royalty-free,
non-exclusive
license
to
reproduce,
translate,
and
use
all
such
copyrighted
material
for
its
own
purposes.
sponsor
may,
if
it
prefers,
receive
only
an
option
license.
3.
Review
Patent
Purposes
Under
most
research
agreements,
as
described
in
Section
I,
which
follows,
disposition
rights
inventions,
including
whether
what
countries
file
patent
applications.
therefore,
acquires
rights,
exclusive
or
licenses,
when
MIT
does
fact
patents.
Institute
reserves
sole
right
determine
some
however,
may
make
filing
recommendations
obtain
inventions
might
not
otherwise
pursue,
file.
these
circumstances,
needs
opportunity
review
potentially
patentable
before
are
defeated
is
also
given
manuscripts
prior
publication
order
action
be
up
30
submission
publisher.
previously
parties
60
days
necessary
take
steps
Office,
H.3.1.
In
under
consortia
no
required
student
thesis.
An
appropriate
clause
set
forth
REVIEW
5/82
publication.
normal
means
doing
establish
procedure
identifying
disclosing
they
arise,
periodic
intervals,
during
course
research.
This
effective
method
protecting
without
any
delay
publications.
1.5.1.
Patents.
A
describing
cases,
identify
on
have
been
disclosed.
Since
usually
submitted
later
than
publisher
there
normally
ample
time
review.
Where
case,
manuscript
period
undisclosed
identified,
agree
extension
preserve
rights.
arrangements
recommendations.
submitting
(1)
exceed
90
approval
Provost's
(2)
granting
academic
credit
event
that
example,
coordinate
event,
total
more
DRAFT