Machine Generated Data
Tags
Clarifai
Imagga
Text | 97.6 | |
| ||
Document | 80.9 | |
| ||
Paper | 80.8 | |
| ||
Font | 68.6 | |
| ||
Paper product | 66.7 | |
|
Microsoft
text | 97 | |
| ||
letter | 95.4 | |
| ||
book | 50.9 | |
| ||
document | 30.4 | |
| ||
screenshot | 30.1 | |
|
Captions
Microsoft
a close up of text on a white background | 87% | |
| ||
a screenshot of text | 86.9% | |
| ||
a close up of text on a black background | 84% | |
|
Text analysis
Amazon

Charities

Regular

Givers

Cleveland's

Cleveland's Charities Need 12,000 Regular Givers

Need

12,000

Are

You

Are You One?

BENEVOLENCE

One?

Co-operation

Competition

Which

Benevolence

THAN BENEVOLENCE COMPETITION.

Benevolence by Competition Benevolence by Co-operation

Method

Working?

THAN

institutions

by

By Which Method Are You Working?

COMPETITION.

The

By

BETTER

BENEVOLENCE CO-OPERATION IS BETTER

CO-OPERATION

IS

charitable

UNJUST.

The directors Cleveland's charitable

YEAR

between institutions between institutions

between

past

Cleveland's in past have 6.000

have

directors

IV.

VI.

in

any

reat

IIL.

EACH

6.000

HI.

Cleveland's Charities Need 12,000 Regular Givers
Are You One?
Benevolence by Co-operation
Benevolence by Competition
between institutions is:
between institutions is:
few, EACH
by
YEAR DIMINISHING IN NUMBER.
interested eitize by increasing numbers of informed
II. VEXATIOUS,generosity being rewarded by constantly
II
PLEASURABLE; the making of free choice of any or all
forms
increased pressure and more numerous appeals on
those known to give.
human service according to one's wishes.
III. ECONOMICAL
without favor or oreiudice. the needs of ittthree in.
III.
ysolicitors
(some receive 33%% commission) to visit the same
stitutions.
person.
IV. EF hest method ATE, each organization ap
IV.
lack of correlation of method. field. or infuence
ough
lessen the good will possessed by others in the
care not
broad field of human welfare.
V.
V.
to grow as result of effective solicitation rather than
on the the worth of its work as done by officers and boards
of directors freed from their present taxing labors as
collectors.
genuine worth.
VI ve this great, unified proble reet
VI. COGENT, because CONCERTED and CONSTRUCTIVE
ordinated attempt to solve the community problem of
poverty and need.
By Which Method Are You Working?
The directors and social workers of fifty-three of Cleveland's mosst progressive charitable
organizations believe that for all concerned BENEVOLENCE BY cO-OPERATION IS BETTER
THAN BENEVOLENCE BY COMPETITION
Cleveland's charities in the past have been supported by less than 6,000 givers, under one
per cent of the city's population. Do you think that we are too optimistic in believing that 12,000
people in Cleveland should have a stockholders's interest in charity? Are you going to become one of
Moreover, are you going to take the stand NOW in order
We want your sympathetic help in making this week, June 2-9,
the "Benevolent Twelve Thousand?"
to meet pressing current needs?
in very truth a "Good VWill and Decision Week."
If you have already made your year's gifts, make NOW a tentative subscription of your gifts
after October first next or set a time when your subscription will be possible for you. No further
solicitation will then be made of you.
Make checks to "Federaticn for Charity and Philanthropy."
THE CLEVELAND FEDERATION FOR CHARITY AND PHILANTHROPY
419 Chamber of Commerce
Main 5636

Regular

by

Benevolence

between

institutions

YEAR

NUMBER.

numbers

and

more

known

to

according

one's

wishes.

without

of

ysolicitors

stitutions.

EF

ap

good

the

V.

as

taxing

genuine

ve

great,

reet

VI.

Are

You

mosst

charitable

IS

BETTER

BY

COMPETITION

been

supported

than

cent

should

in

become

you

going

want

this

"Benevolent

meet

very

"Good

Week."

If

have

year's

tentative

gifts

set

when

you.

THE

FOR

Givers

is:

EACH

increasing

rewarded

free

choice

pressure

appeals

those

receive

person.

IV.

lack

correlation

field.

will

others

care

on

worth

its

done

directors

freed

their

VI

unified

CONSTRUCTIVE

Working?

The

Cleveland's

all

charities

6,000

too

sympathetic

Twelve

pressing

needs?

truth

make

first

or

a

your

for

further

then

FEDERATION

Charities

Need

few,

interested

eitize

informed

II.

being

PLEASURABLE;

numerous

give.

III.

oreiudice.

in.

commission)

hest

method

ough

possessed

broad

welfare.

present

COGENT,

because

solve

problem

poverty

social

workers

that

less

givers,

under

city's

think

optimistic

people

charity?

one

NOW

help

2-9,

gifts,

after

next

time

be

No

Charity

AND

419

Chamber

12,000

DIMINISHING

IN

constantly

II

making

forms

increased

ECONOMICAL

needs

(some

33%%

same

organization

method.

not

human

effective

rather

collectors.

worth.

CONCERTED

Method

believe

concerned

BENEVOLENCE

THAN

past

per

we

believing

Moreover,

are

stand

order

week,

VWill

Decision

subscription

"Federaticn

Philanthropy."

CLEVELAND

CHARITY

Commerce

5636

One?

Co-operation

Competition

VEXATIOUS,generosity

any

service

favor

ittthree

visit

ATE,

each

infuence

lessen

field

grow

result

solicitation

work

officers

boards

from

labors

proble

ordinated

attempt

community

need.

By

Which

fifty-three

progressive

organizations

cO-OPERATION

population.

Do

Cleveland

stockholders's

interest

take

We

June

Thousand?"

current

already

made

October

possible

Make

checks

PHILANTHROPY

Main