Machine Generated Data
Tags
Clarifai
created on 2019-06-07
Imagga
created on 2019-06-07
Google
created on 2019-06-07
Text | 97.6 | |
| ||
Document | 80.9 | |
| ||
Paper | 80.8 | |
| ||
Font | 68.6 | |
| ||
Paper product | 66.7 | |
|
Microsoft
created on 2019-06-07
text | 97 | |
| ||
letter | 95.4 | |
| ||
book | 50.9 | |
| ||
document | 30.4 | |
| ||
screenshot | 30.1 | |
|
Color Analysis
Categories
Imagga
text visuals | 100% | |
|
Captions
Microsoft
created on 2019-06-07
a close up of text on a white background | 87% | |
| ||
a screenshot of text | 86.9% | |
| ||
a close up of text on a black background | 84% | |
|
Text analysis
Amazon

Charities

Regular

Givers

Cleveland's

Cleveland's Charities Need 12,000 Regular Givers

Need

12,000

Are

You

Are You One?

BENEVOLENCE

One?

Co-operation

Competition

Which

Benevolence

THAN BENEVOLENCE COMPETITION.

Benevolence by Competition Benevolence by Co-operation

Method

Working?

THAN

institutions

by

By Which Method Are You Working?

COMPETITION.

The

By

BETTER

BENEVOLENCE CO-OPERATION IS BETTER

CO-OPERATION

IS

charitable

UNJUST.

The directors Cleveland's charitable

YEAR

between institutions between institutions

between

past

Cleveland's in past have 6.000

have

directors

IV.

VI.

in

any

reat

IIL.

EACH

6.000

HI.

Cleveland's Charities Need 12,000 Regular Givers
Are You One?
Benevolence by Co-operation
Benevolence by Competition
between institutions is:
between institutions is:
few, EACH
by
YEAR DIMINISHING IN NUMBER.
interested eitize by increasing numbers of informed
II. VEXATIOUS,generosity being rewarded by constantly
II
PLEASURABLE; the making of free choice of any or all
forms
increased pressure and more numerous appeals on
those known to give.
human service according to one's wishes.
III. ECONOMICAL
without favor or oreiudice. the needs of ittthree in.
III.
ysolicitors
(some receive 33%% commission) to visit the same
stitutions.
person.
IV. EF hest method ATE, each organization ap
IV.
lack of correlation of method. field. or infuence
ough
lessen the good will possessed by others in the
care not
broad field of human welfare.
V.
V.
to grow as result of effective solicitation rather than
on the the worth of its work as done by officers and boards
of directors freed from their present taxing labors as
collectors.
genuine worth.
VI ve this great, unified proble reet
VI. COGENT, because CONCERTED and CONSTRUCTIVE
ordinated attempt to solve the community problem of
poverty and need.
By Which Method Are You Working?
The directors and social workers of fifty-three of Cleveland's mosst progressive charitable
organizations believe that for all concerned BENEVOLENCE BY cO-OPERATION IS BETTER
THAN BENEVOLENCE BY COMPETITION
Cleveland's charities in the past have been supported by less than 6,000 givers, under one
per cent of the city's population. Do you think that we are too optimistic in believing that 12,000
people in Cleveland should have a stockholders's interest in charity? Are you going to become one of
Moreover, are you going to take the stand NOW in order
We want your sympathetic help in making this week, June 2-9,
the "Benevolent Twelve Thousand?"
to meet pressing current needs?
in very truth a "Good VWill and Decision Week."
If you have already made your year's gifts, make NOW a tentative subscription of your gifts
after October first next or set a time when your subscription will be possible for you. No further
solicitation will then be made of you.
Make checks to "Federaticn for Charity and Philanthropy."
THE CLEVELAND FEDERATION FOR CHARITY AND PHILANTHROPY
419 Chamber of Commerce
Main 5636

Cleveland's

Charities

Need

12,000

Regular

Givers

Are

You

One?

Benevolence

by

Co-operation

Competition

between

institutions

is:

few,

EACH

YEAR

DIMINISHING

IN

NUMBER.

interested

eitize

increasing

numbers

of

informed

II.

VEXATIOUS,generosity

being

rewarded

constantly

II

PLEASURABLE;

the

making

free

choice

any

or

all

forms

increased

pressure

and

more

numerous

appeals

on

those

known

to

give.

human

service

according

one's

wishes.

III.

ECONOMICAL

without

favor

oreiudice.

needs

ittthree

in.

ysolicitors

(some

receive

33%%

commission)

visit

same

stitutions.

person.

IV.

EF

hest

method

ATE,

each

organization

ap

lack

correlation

method.

field.

infuence

ough

lessen

good

will

possessed

others

in

care

not

broad

field

welfare.

V.

grow

as

result

effective

solicitation

rather

than

worth

its

work

done

officers

boards

directors

freed

from

their

present

taxing

labors

collectors.

genuine

worth.

VI

ve

this

great,

unified

proble

reet

VI.

COGENT,

because

CONCERTED

CONSTRUCTIVE

ordinated

attempt

solve

community

problem

poverty

need.

By

Which

Method

Working?

The

social

workers

fifty-three

mosst

progressive

charitable

organizations

believe

that

for

concerned

BENEVOLENCE

BY

cO-OPERATION

IS

BETTER

THAN

COMPETITION

charities

past

have

been

supported

less

6,000

givers,

under

one

per

cent

city's

population.

Do

you

think

we

are

too

optimistic

believing

people

Cleveland

should

a

stockholders's

interest

charity?

going

become

Moreover,

take

stand

NOW

order

We

want

your

sympathetic

help

week,

June

2-9,

"Benevolent

Twelve

Thousand?"

meet

pressing

current

needs?

very

truth

"Good

VWill

Decision

Week."

If

already

made

year's

gifts,

make

tentative

subscription

gifts

after

October

first

next

set

time

when

be

possible

you.

No

further

then

Make

checks

"Federaticn

Charity

Philanthropy."

THE

CLEVELAND

FEDERATION

FOR

CHARITY

AND

PHILANTHROPY

419

Chamber

Commerce

Main

5636