Machine Generated Data
Tags
Amazon
created on 2022-01-23
Person | 99.7 | |
| ||
Human | 99.7 | |
| ||
Person | 99.5 | |
| ||
Person | 99.2 | |
| ||
Person | 99 | |
| ||
Person | 98.9 | |
| ||
Person | 98.9 | |
| ||
Person | 98.8 | |
| ||
Person | 97 | |
| ||
Person | 96.8 | |
| ||
Person | 96.6 | |
| ||
Clothing | 95.9 | |
| ||
Apparel | 95.9 | |
| ||
Person | 95.3 | |
| ||
Shoe | 94.1 | |
| ||
Footwear | 94.1 | |
| ||
Crowd | 92.2 | |
| ||
People | 87.1 | |
| ||
Shorts | 85.6 | |
| ||
Person | 83.2 | |
| ||
Person | 71.1 | |
| ||
Audience | 67.2 | |
| ||
Person | 66.3 | |
| ||
Person | 63.5 | |
| ||
Photography | 58.2 | |
| ||
Photo | 58.2 | |
| ||
Wedding | 56.8 | |
| ||
Party | 56.3 | |
| ||
Gown | 56 | |
| ||
Fashion | 56 | |
| ||
Female | 55.8 | |
| ||
Shoe | 55.2 | |
| ||
Shoe | 53.2 | |
| ||
Shoe | 51 | |
| ||
Person | 46.2 | |
|
Clarifai
created on 2023-10-27
Imagga
created on 2022-01-23
Google
created on 2022-01-23
Footwear | 98 | |
| ||
White | 92.2 | |
| ||
Human | 89.1 | |
| ||
Standing | 86.4 | |
| ||
Style | 84 | |
| ||
Social group | 83.1 | |
| ||
Hat | 81 | |
| ||
Crowd | 78.3 | |
| ||
Crew | 76.8 | |
| ||
Monochrome photography | 73.4 | |
| ||
Monochrome | 72.4 | |
| ||
Team | 71.6 | |
| ||
Event | 71.3 | |
| ||
Sky | 69.7 | |
| ||
Art | 66.7 | |
| ||
Uniform | 66.7 | |
| ||
Vintage clothing | 62.9 | |
| ||
Stock photography | 62.7 | |
| ||
Pole | 60.5 | |
| ||
Font | 57.1 | |
|
Color Analysis
Face analysis
Amazon

AWS Rekognition
Age | 30-40 |
Gender | Female, 54.3% |
Calm | 39.4% |
Sad | 32.1% |
Happy | 22.2% |
Disgusted | 2% |
Confused | 1.8% |
Angry | 1.1% |
Surprised | 0.9% |
Fear | 0.6% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 29-39 |
Gender | Male, 83.8% |
Sad | 48.6% |
Calm | 28% |
Fear | 9.5% |
Happy | 5.7% |
Surprised | 4% |
Confused | 2.1% |
Disgusted | 1.2% |
Angry | 0.8% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 21-29 |
Gender | Male, 91.4% |
Calm | 51% |
Sad | 45.1% |
Confused | 2% |
Angry | 0.7% |
Surprised | 0.5% |
Disgusted | 0.4% |
Happy | 0.3% |
Fear | 0.1% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 43-51 |
Gender | Male, 99.9% |
Calm | 44.8% |
Sad | 15.9% |
Happy | 11.8% |
Disgusted | 11.2% |
Confused | 6.8% |
Angry | 4.1% |
Surprised | 4% |
Fear | 1.4% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 25-35 |
Gender | Female, 98.1% |
Sad | 67.2% |
Calm | 27.8% |
Happy | 2.3% |
Confused | 1.1% |
Surprised | 0.6% |
Disgusted | 0.5% |
Angry | 0.4% |
Fear | 0.3% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 33-41 |
Gender | Female, 89.3% |
Calm | 89.5% |
Sad | 6.9% |
Happy | 1% |
Surprised | 0.9% |
Angry | 0.6% |
Confused | 0.5% |
Fear | 0.4% |
Disgusted | 0.3% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 38-46 |
Gender | Female, 77.4% |
Calm | 80.4% |
Sad | 7.5% |
Fear | 3.5% |
Disgusted | 3% |
Happy | 2.4% |
Angry | 1.4% |
Confused | 1.2% |
Surprised | 0.6% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 23-31 |
Gender | Male, 53% |
Calm | 44.5% |
Sad | 44.1% |
Fear | 3.7% |
Angry | 3.4% |
Happy | 1.8% |
Confused | 1.3% |
Disgusted | 0.7% |
Surprised | 0.4% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 25-35 |
Gender | Female, 65% |
Sad | 63.5% |
Confused | 27.5% |
Calm | 5.8% |
Surprised | 0.8% |
Disgusted | 0.7% |
Happy | 0.6% |
Fear | 0.5% |
Angry | 0.5% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 26-36 |
Gender | Male, 98.6% |
Calm | 87.1% |
Happy | 5.2% |
Sad | 2.4% |
Confused | 1.5% |
Fear | 1.4% |
Angry | 1% |
Disgusted | 0.7% |
Surprised | 0.7% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 36-44 |
Gender | Female, 99% |
Sad | 65.4% |
Calm | 11.9% |
Happy | 7.3% |
Confused | 5.1% |
Disgusted | 3.6% |
Angry | 3.5% |
Surprised | 1.8% |
Fear | 1.4% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 19-27 |
Gender | Male, 85.6% |
Sad | 56.9% |
Calm | 37.5% |
Happy | 2% |
Confused | 1.3% |
Fear | 0.8% |
Angry | 0.7% |
Disgusted | 0.5% |
Surprised | 0.3% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 26-36 |
Gender | Male, 88.6% |
Sad | 98.3% |
Calm | 1.1% |
Confused | 0.3% |
Surprised | 0.1% |
Disgusted | 0.1% |
Fear | 0.1% |
Angry | 0% |
Happy | 0% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 29-39 |
Gender | Female, 84.1% |
Sad | 98.8% |
Happy | 0.4% |
Calm | 0.4% |
Fear | 0.2% |
Confused | 0.1% |
Angry | 0.1% |
Disgusted | 0.1% |
Surprised | 0% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 23-31 |
Gender | Male, 67.1% |
Calm | 76.2% |
Fear | 6.5% |
Sad | 5.7% |
Confused | 4.7% |
Happy | 3.2% |
Disgusted | 1.7% |
Angry | 1.2% |
Surprised | 0.9% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 43-51 |
Gender | Male, 94.2% |
Calm | 98% |
Sad | 1.4% |
Confused | 0.2% |
Fear | 0.1% |
Disgusted | 0.1% |
Angry | 0.1% |
Happy | 0% |
Surprised | 0% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 27-37 |
Gender | Male, 80.7% |
Calm | 96.3% |
Sad | 2.3% |
Confused | 0.5% |
Surprised | 0.2% |
Happy | 0.2% |
Angry | 0.2% |
Disgusted | 0.1% |
Fear | 0.1% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 48-54 |
Gender | Male, 70.9% |
Confused | 52.6% |
Calm | 28.6% |
Sad | 10.9% |
Surprised | 2% |
Fear | 1.8% |
Angry | 1.7% |
Disgusted | 1.5% |
Happy | 0.9% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 24-34 |
Gender | Male, 62.6% |
Calm | 43.6% |
Sad | 30.8% |
Disgusted | 7.2% |
Fear | 7.1% |
Angry | 4.2% |
Surprised | 3.4% |
Happy | 2.2% |
Confused | 1.5% |

AWS Rekognition
Age | 27-37 |
Gender | Male, 50% |
Sad | 52.3% |
Calm | 41.9% |
Confused | 1.7% |
Fear | 1.3% |
Happy | 1.2% |
Disgusted | 1% |
Angry | 0.4% |
Surprised | 0.3% |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Unlikely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Likely |

Google Vision
Surprise | Very unlikely |
Anger | Very unlikely |
Sorrow | Very unlikely |
Joy | Very unlikely |
Headwear | Very unlikely |
Blurred | Very likely |
Feature analysis
Categories
Imagga
people portraits | 46.1% | |
| ||
paintings art | 35.2% | |
| ||
interior objects | 6.9% | |
| ||
text visuals | 5.8% | |
| ||
streetview architecture | 2.3% | |
| ||
events parties | 1.6% | |
|
Captions
Microsoft
created by unknown on 2022-01-23
a group of people posing for a photo in front of a crowd | 91.6% | |
| ||
a group of people standing in front of a crowd posing for the camera | 90.5% | |
| ||
a group of people posing for a photo | 90.4% | |
|
Clarifai
created by general-english-image-caption-blip on 2025-05-18
a photograph of a group of people standing around a cake | -100% | |
|
Google Gemini
Created by gemini-2.0-flash on 2025-05-18
The photograph shows a large crowd of people, varying in age and dress. In the middle of the crowd, a man stands on a raised platform, possibly giving a speech or addressing the crowd. The crowd is dense, with people closely packed together. The image is shot in black and white and appears to be from an older era, given the clothing styles of the individuals. The overall mood is one of assembly or gathering, likely for some sort of public event.
Created by gemini-2.0-flash-lite on 2025-05-18
Here's a description of the image:
Overall Impression:
The image appears to be a negative photograph, meaning the colors are inverted (light areas appear dark, and dark areas appear light). It depicts a large crowd of people, likely outdoors, gathered in what seems to be a public setting. The focus is on a group in the foreground, while a speaker at a podium is visible in the background.
Key Features:
- The Crowd: A dense group of people of various ages and apparent clothing styles fills the frame. They are densely packed together.
- The Speaker: In the upper center of the photo, a person stands behind a podium, possibly addressing the crowd.
- Foreground Focus: The foreground has a group of children, young adults, and adults in a line or a loose formation. The people in the foreground are more clearly defined.
- Clothing and Style: The clothing styles suggest the photo could be from the mid-20th century. The styles include jackets, button-down shirts, skirts, and hats.
Atmosphere:
The image suggests an organized gathering. The crowd seems to be attentive and engaged. The photograph is well-composed.
Technical Aspects:
- The image is of a negative photograph with a negative effect.
- The shot is a wide view.
Possible Context:
Based on the composition and apparent age of the photo, it could be from a public event, a political rally, or a community gathering.
Mistral Pixtral
Created by us.mistral.pixtral-large-2502-v1:0 on 2025-05-31
The image is a black-and-white photograph showing a large crowd of people gathered in an outdoor setting. The people appear to be of varying ages, and many of them are wearing casual clothing, such as shorts, t-shirts, and light jackets. Some individuals are carrying bags or other personal items. The crowd seems to be engaged in an event or gathering, possibly a parade or a public celebration, given the large number of people and the organized formation.
The photograph captures a diverse group, with some people looking towards the camera while others are engaged in conversation or looking in different directions. The background is slightly blurred, indicating a focus on the crowd in the foreground. There are also some structures or poles visible in the background, suggesting an urban or semi-urban environment. The overall atmosphere appears to be lively and communal.
Text analysis
Amazon








